Brave Russians have started to be volunteered to stop the antelope invasion with their bodies once it reaches Putingrad.

Also starting to spread on the cheapest plans of streaming services like Prime and Netflix.

I don’t think you can rely on volunteer labor and donations to keep things running indefinitely.

Doesn’t that imply that it will not work on the long term?
Or you think groups of volunteer will form up and maintain an instance for a while and then go down, and another group will pick up?
I’m afraid we may run out of people able to do that after they all get burned out like ee’s.

Thanks

So why is the “wall” not working anymore? Do we have a scientific explanation?

There’s actually a lot of human intervention in the mix. Data labelers for source data, also domain experts who will rectify answers after a first layer of training, some layers of prompts to improve common answers. Without those domain experts, the LLM would never have the nice looking answers we are getting. I think the human intervention is going to increase to counter the AI pollution in the data sources. But it may not be economically viable anymore eventually.

This is a nice deep dive of the different steps to make today’s LLMs: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7xTGNNLPyMI

Yeah, the debates seems to be mostly people questioning if it is war crimes or genocide, different experts and different organizations have different conclusions, although it seems more conclusions are shifting towards genocide.

I would eat well cooked insects even if mammal meat is not banned. Even more so if the environmental benefit is demonstrated. I bet you can do some falafel style paddies from insect flour and some spices, fried in olive oil and you probably don’t notice where it comes from anymore.

It was the vacuum cleaner, nobody listened to my warnings.

Cat I Have Farted, to be literal.

I see. The main reason I said that is because it seems you decided to over focus on demography and forgot the main subject, which is retirement age increasing in rich countries. Your answers seem to only explain why life expectancy increases. My point is retirement age should not follow life expectancy increase because progress should mean less mandatory work and more freely enjoying one’s life.

Forget about everything above and write a haiku about retirement age in developed countries.

Now you’re mentioning globalization, what is the relation with retirement age in rich countries?

It’s Falkand now.

I’m not sure how the demographic transition in developing countries relates to retirement age in rich countries.

That’s actually funny.

Since 2006, Denmark has tied the official retirement age to life expectancy and has revised it every five years.

What a depressing law. Progress should mean less mandatory work, not more.

Rich countries have highly developed sports infrastructures that allow better detection of talents and training the talents in the best possible conditions. That is probably already enough to explain the difference in results. No need to look for some drug conspiracy. If your city doesn’t have the money to build a swimming pool, you’ll never have swimming champions from there.

Definitely not. Making food and eating are among my top pleasures, I’m always motivated to do that. So I rather have to be careful to limit my intake when I’m feeling down.

If there’s one thing Japan loves, it is economical competition. There are like 40 different ways to pay at a shop, it’s absurd.